<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Site:  New Layout!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://john-simm.org/archives/456/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://john-simm.org/archives/456</link>
	<description>Your ultimate resource for all things John Simm!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:49:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiggy</title>
		<link>http://john-simm.org/archives/456/comment-page-1#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john-simm.org/?p=456#comment-56</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with the first poster--it is hard to read the text. The gray stuff is easier to read now, but the red text areas are still very low-contrast and have to be highlighted and/or squinted at to be legible. They&#039;re all muted and dark right now, especially on the banner and right underneath it, and I have a pretty bright screen as well. Don&#039;t be afraid to use bold contrasts, because as the first poster said, that&#039;s just good web design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with the first poster&#8211;it is hard to read the text. The gray stuff is easier to read now, but the red text areas are still very low-contrast and have to be highlighted and/or squinted at to be legible. They&#8217;re all muted and dark right now, especially on the banner and right underneath it, and I have a pretty bright screen as well. Don&#8217;t be afraid to use bold contrasts, because as the first poster said, that&#8217;s just good web design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://john-simm.org/archives/456/comment-page-1#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john-simm.org/?p=456#comment-54</guid>
		<description>I have edited the colouring a little for the titles and the main news.  Can you let me know if this improves your viewing please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have edited the colouring a little for the titles and the main news.  Can you let me know if this improves your viewing please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://john-simm.org/archives/456/comment-page-1#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://john-simm.org/?p=456#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, but your new format of dark-text-on-even-darker-background format is almost unreadable to me. There&#039;s a reason that usability experts like Jakob Nielsen strongly advise Web designers to emphasize high contrast between text and background.

I can read the body text only with great difficulty. It is *impossible* for me to read the dark-red headings. The only way I can read with with ease is if I click Select All to highlight the text, which gives me the &quot;effect&quot; of high-contrast dark text on white. This, of course, is a hassle for me, and it makes a hash of the design.

I popped straight over here when I saw your tweet about the redesign. My heart sank when I saw the result. I love your site&#039;s content and am grateful for the wonderful work you do, but I can&#039;t see spending much time here if you keep this design. I was perfectly happy with the old one, to tell you the truth. Please, please, please consider boosting the contrast on this page! You may lose a lot of readers otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but your new format of dark-text-on-even-darker-background format is almost unreadable to me. There&#8217;s a reason that usability experts like Jakob Nielsen strongly advise Web designers to emphasize high contrast between text and background.</p>
<p>I can read the body text only with great difficulty. It is *impossible* for me to read the dark-red headings. The only way I can read with with ease is if I click Select All to highlight the text, which gives me the &#8220;effect&#8221; of high-contrast dark text on white. This, of course, is a hassle for me, and it makes a hash of the design.</p>
<p>I popped straight over here when I saw your tweet about the redesign. My heart sank when I saw the result. I love your site&#8217;s content and am grateful for the wonderful work you do, but I can&#8217;t see spending much time here if you keep this design. I was perfectly happy with the old one, to tell you the truth. Please, please, please consider boosting the contrast on this page! You may lose a lot of readers otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
